
The overall experience of a performance in a theater is difficult to gauge accurately because there a multiple of interacting forces that are mostly invisible, such as acoustics and sight lines. Furthermore there are a number of moving features like stage lifts, curtains…
The overall experience of a performance in a theater is difficult to gauge accurately because there a multiple of interacting forces that are mostly invisible, such as acoustics and sight lines. Furthermore there are a number of moving features like stage lifts, curtains and seating towers that make the building functionally mobile. Until an actual performance it is never 100% certain that all the assumptions made were correct.
Since the building includes two user clients that are somewhat opposed in their needs, the opera and ballet companies, then a great deal of effort is spent analyzing which group should benefit or not from the design.
The overall experience of a performance in a theater is difficult to gauge accurately because there a multiple of interacting forces that are mostly invisible, such as acoustics and sight lines. Furthermore there are a number of moving features like stage lifts, curtains and seating towers that make the building functionally mobile. Until an actual performance it is never 100% certain that all the assumptions made were correct.
We spend a good deal of time retraining our staff to think differently than the way they were trained. We focus more on interaction and discussion and allow for intuitive discussion as well as more quantifiable or derivative directions. There seems to be an increasing lack of focus on the human experience and enrichment of the built environment coming from many schools now. 3D modeling, visualization, and parametric tools are revolutionary and useful tools, but they cannot be the primary tool forming architecture.





Leave a Response